Re:Rust is more than safety
by softc on Wednesday December 28, 2016 @02:59PM
(#13273166)
Just to clarify, In this specific case, I think we're talking about interface, not implementation.
Your preference is fair, since interface is a subjective issue. Personally, I find it more convenient to simply assume all code can encounter a error. Given that assumption, I find it redundant to add extra syntax to fail on unhandled errors.
Your preference is fair, since interface is a subjective issue. Personally, I find it more convenient to simply assume all code can encounter a error. Given that assumption, I find it redundant to add extra syntax to fail on unhandled errors.