News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel Kaby Lake Potentially an Overclocker's Dream, Seen ... by Baeocystin on Wednesday December 28, 2016 @09:01AM (#13270474)
The first time I built an Abit BP6 with dual Celeron 300's (overclocked to 450, naturally) I felt like I was getting a supercomputer for cheap. The performance increase going to dual-core was massive, and getting to use the cheap Celerons instead of the crazy-expensive Pentium II's paid for the rest of the system all on its own. The late 90's/early 2000's were exciting times for system builders.

Now? Meh. I still build my own, because you can spec out exactly what you want. But there's no longer any compelling performance reason to do anything beyond stock cooling and stock clocks.

Re:Intel Kaby Lake Potentially an Overclocker's Dream, Seen ... by patates on Thursday December 29, 2016 @05:57AM (#13276690)
Yeah, and any reasonable overclocking you can do is already automated by some ridiculously designed tuning tool from the manufacturer.

I'm not sure about this but I think any overclocking people do these days are for the fun of the journey, not for reaching the destination.