Faster Images using HTTP2 and Progressive JPEGs

Re:Faster Images using HTTP2 and Progressive JPEGs by philbo on Wednesday December 28, 2016 @06:35AM (#13269888)

True. As ever, it makes sense to A/B test these things with your userbase. Their behaviour is more important to your own sites than any research or personal preference.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Faster Images using HTTP2 and Progressive JPEGs by danielrhodes on Wednesday December 28, 2016 @06:37AM (#13269894)

Can't you just reason that images coming through earlier is a better experience than not? Do you really need to AB test this?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Faster Images using HTTP2 and Progressive JPEGs by Normal_gaussian on Wednesday December 28, 2016 @08:18AM (#13270267)

You can. You can also be wrong.

If the value coming through your site is great enough that marginal improvements (on the order of 1%) are worth time investment (compared to other available improvement avenues) then this is something you should A/B test.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Faster Images using HTTP2 and Progressive JPEGs by trav4225 on Wednesday December 28, 2016 @03:54PM (#13273558)

Hah, I'm surprised at the replies here. I guess I'm in the minority opinion (I don't like progressive loading of anything; just prepare the page, then show it to me :-).

[ Parent | on HN ]