News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Maslow's Hierarchy of Site Reliability Engineering Needs (2015). Parent comment

Re:Maslow's Hierarchy of Site Reliability Engineering Needs ... by closeparen on Tuesday December 27, 2016 @11:17PM (#13268388)
The term SRE espouses a philosophy that when SRE has done its job perfectly, there is no operations work because the system is reliable on its own.

If you're looking for members of that school of thought, you say SRE. If you're comfortable having a "boiler room" and just need to staff it up, the terms sysadmin and devops work just fine depending on the level of coding involved.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Maslow's Hierarchy of Site Reliability Engineering Needs ... by nikolay on Tuesday December 27, 2016 @11:36PM (#13268437)
I dig a little bit before commenting (SRE vs DevOps), but SRE as an abbreviation is ugly and reliability is assumed for every subject or role, so, it's redundant.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Maslow's Hierarchy of Site Reliability Engineering Needs ... by closeparen on Wednesday December 28, 2016 @03:25PM (#13273331)
SRE is about engineering systems to be reliable, which is certainly not a goal taken seriously by default. In a traditional environment the system itself is not reliable and not trying (very hard) to be; rather, the combination of system + pager-carrying operators is reliable.

Many more people are paging operators to do DB replica promotions by hand, than are inplementing distributed consensus algorithms and self-healing distributed databases.

[ Parent | on HN ]