News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber Freight by the_rosentotter on Tuesday December 27, 2016 @08:57AM (#13263134)
You're right, 'can be run' != 'is run'. According to Wikipedia, the Emma Maersk has a crew of 13:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_M%C3%A6rsk

Still not a lot of fat to cut for a ship with the capacity of a medium size port.

Re:Uber Freight by bkor on Tuesday December 27, 2016 @11:24AM (#13264003)
The captains I asked was a captain for one of Maersk E-class vessels. They don't use the minimal amount. Unfortunately it's been a few years since I asked and I don't remember much of the details, just that the stated minimal crew is not what's on a vessel.
Re:Uber Freight by londons_explore on Tuesday December 27, 2016 @11:27AM (#13264020)
If a ship has no people, it also needs no bridge, control room, bedrooms, kitchen etc. If it has none of that, it needs to water system, toilets, lighting, heating etc.

And with all that gone, you could fit a lot more cargo on the same size boat.

Re:Uber Freight by tptacek on Tuesday December 27, 2016 @11:48AM (#13264163)
Can you express "a lot" as a percentage of existing capacity? Because it seems like, relative to the amount of cargo space these ships already have, that percentage would be pretty small.
Re:Uber Freight by EdHominem on Tuesday December 27, 2016 @07:32PM (#13267519)
By eyeballing an Emma Maersk diagram, I think you could get three more stacks of containers, for ~5% more capacity.
Re:Uber Freight by tptacek on Tuesday December 27, 2016 @08:56PM (#13267868)
Related question: if they wanted 5% more capacity in the Emma Maersk, what kept them from just building it that way? Are the sizes of these ships a fuel and utilization efficiency optimization problem?