News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Linux 2.5, Ruby 1.9 and Python 3 release management a... by Someone on Tuesday December 27, 2016 @04:25AM (#13262179)
IBM (Oracle, too, I would guess).

http://www.longpelaexpertise.com.au/ezine/IBMBackwardCompati... has a very good observation, though:

"The reality is that backward compatibility is only possible if there are enough users paying […] for it."

It is the same for Microsoft. If, for example, several big customers would want 16 bit support on x64, I'm sure they would provide it.

There are no comments on this comment yet.