Re:Show HN: Mitmproxy 1.0 released, now with a web interface
by feld on Monday December 26, 2016 @10:45PM
(#13261161)
Why wouldn't X window forwarding be ok?
Re:Show HN: Mitmproxy 1.0 released, now with a web interface
by colemickens on Tuesday December 27, 2016 @03:21AM
(#13261956)
I've never had X forwarding work well enough to actually be usable, and last time I checked NX was still a massive (/non-free) pain to setup.
Besides, I already have a workflow that works perfectly fine, is headless as I prefer, works with mitmproxy, etc.
Also, I installed Fiddler from AUR again this afternoon and it just looked awful. The settings menus were unreadable, for example.
And I suppose it's been long enough since trying Fiddler for Linux that I should reserve my experiences from last time around. I've gotten pretty used to mitmproxy. Seems to be the defacto, goto tool for HTTP captures on Linux.