News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reflecting on Haskell in 2016 by dllthomas on Monday December 26, 2016 @03:17AM (#13257471)
I don't see how that's contrary to what the parent said.
Re:Reflecting on Haskell in 2016 by axman6 on Wednesday December 28, 2016 @05:50AM (#13269735)
I guess that my point was that for the situations where the built in syntax in OO languages is used, the lens alternative is usually at most about 2 characters longer, which is hardly more inconvenient.
Re:Reflecting on Haskell in 2016 by dllthomas on Wednesday December 28, 2016 @10:18AM (#13270992)
That's a point, just one that was entirely missing from your previous comment.

That said, it's not just use. You've also gotta deal with some additional imports, and with defining your lenses. For the simplest case, that's a bit of overhead compared to having it all baked in.