News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:'All I wanted to do is build a house' (2010) by clarkmoody on Sunday December 25, 2016 @09:57PM (#13256686)
Multiply the simple act of kissing the bureaucrat's ring a million fold and you get secular stagnation in the economy. Every small decision by entrepreneurs of whether to try that new product must be weighed against the bureaucratic burden. Every new "common sense" rule comes with permanent costs. Each time a regulator has latitude to determine whether you can move forward with your project -- as opposed to a strict rule book with concrete requirements -- that regulator is susceptible to corruption and political retaliation. When the needle starts to tip toward entrepreneurs not taking the risk, then you get stagnation. The bureaucracy will slowly strangle the vibrant economy to death.
Re:'All I wanted to do is build a house' (2010) by marcosdumay on Monday December 26, 2016 @12:02PM (#13258870)
One side of the problem is that "strict rule book with concrete requirements" translate into stamps for quality certification and plenty of dumb rule following.
Re:'All I wanted to do is build a house' (2010) by clarkmoody on Monday December 26, 2016 @04:47PM (#13259932)
Of course.

But the alternative of rules that are open to interpretation is worse. If there must be rules, let them be clear and concrete.

Re:'All I wanted to do is build a house' (2010) by marcosdumay on Tuesday December 27, 2016 @12:49PM (#13264641)
Taken to an extreme, clear rules not open to interpretation lead exactly to the crazy situation you can read on the article.