Re:Why is Mail Online going after the fact checkers?
by mst on Saturday December 24, 2016 @04:03PM
(#13251612)
> If you're writing a journalistic article and you're criticising something, you better have a very good reason for not linking it.
I think "I want to talk about their attitude to fake news, not further spread the salacious details of their only-sort-of-related coverage" is ... a reason.
I think saying basically that, and providing a link afterwards that one would hope readers would choose not to click, would've been a better approach from a broadsheet.
I think "I want to talk about their attitude to fake news, not further spread the salacious details of their only-sort-of-related coverage" is ... a reason.
I think saying basically that, and providing a link afterwards that one would hope readers would choose not to click, would've been a better approach from a broadsheet.