News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Scientist and Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Proc... by ZenoArrow on Saturday December 24, 2016 @05:08AM (#13249231)
If someone needs a cover to draw them in then the chances are the book isn't for them. Books like this require effort from the reader in order to internalise the information contained within the book, even if the cover is prettier that's not going to be enough to provide motivation to get through the book.
Re:The Scientist and Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Proc... by jrockway on Saturday December 24, 2016 @05:30AM (#13249282)
You only need someone to buy your book, you don't need them to read it ;)
Re:The Scientist and Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Proc... by cvigoe on Saturday December 24, 2016 @12:45PM (#13250773)
You could extend that argument about aesthetic design to any application though, but I think that may be framing it in the wrong way. It's (usually) not much extra effort to, say, choose a nice font or use a pleasing colour scheme. I don't think good aesthetic design should be reserved for the masses or recreational media. Good aesthetic design isn't "beneath" anything; I don't see a reason to justify bad aesthetic design in educational or instructional resources.
Re:The Scientist and Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Proc... by ZenoArrow on Saturday December 24, 2016 @07:00PM (#13252167)
> "Good aesthetic design isn't "beneath" anything"

I didn't say it was, however if I'm picking up a technical book I'm not fussed what the cover looks like, because I'm already motivated to learn the information contained in the book. It's best if that motivation to learn exists before someone picks up a technical book. If it doesn't the chances of getting through the book are slim to none, regardless of what the cover looks like.