Re:“Children of Men”'s vision of the future is now disturbin...
by legulere on Saturday December 24, 2016 @04:07AM
(#13249146)
Why bring in ideology when you can simply state that TV Tropes is Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licensed, while allthetropes is Attribution-ShareAlike licensed?
Re:“Children of Men”'s vision of the future is now disturbin...
by labster on Saturday December 24, 2016 @05:10AM
(#13249236)
Eh, it was just an interesting article that was featured on HN a few days ago.
Mainly it's just one more reason that I'm still upset at TV Tropes for relicensing things I wrote without my consent. They took a lot of things that used to be community property, and decided that they should be the only ones to make money off of it. And they've gotten away with it because none of their users really know copyright law. I guess really, it's because sometimes ideology matters.
[1]: At least under Stallman's definition of nonfree: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.en.html#Creati...