News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why is Mail Online going after the fact checkers? by camtarn on Friday December 23, 2016 @10:09PM (#13248370)
It feels like Snopes outgrew its roots in urban-legend debunking, and decided to scale up to more real-time fact-checking - either because they saw a commercial opportunity, or just because they felt that they had a duty to do so. I was really surprised earlier this year when I realized they'd employed a staff - for so many years, Snopes was just Barbara and David Mikkelson.

It's a pity if they did scale up for altruistic reasons, but in the process ended up out of their depth - fact-checking news stories in a highly controversial and partisan environment seems like an entirely different kettle of fish than unravelling easily-debunked urban legends.

Re:Why is Mail Online going after the fact checkers? by cloakandswagger on Friday December 23, 2016 @10:47PM (#13248454)
I don't think they are naive or altruistic at all; that same partisan environment offers huge amounts of wealth if you consign with one faction or another.

I'm sure being an Official Facebook Fact Checker is a job that pays quite well.