News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AdNauseam: Fight Back Against Advertising Networks and Pr... by Smaug123 on Wednesday December 21, 2016 @03:13AM (#13227576)
"The cost of not seeing ads is the time I spend setting up and configuring the ad-blocker." - there is also the externalised cost that the sites which rely on ads will eventually go bust if everyone does the same thing as you do. Given the current state of things, you are defecting on a massive Prisoners' Dilemma.
Re:AdNauseam: Fight Back Against Advertising Networks and Pr... by imagist on Wednesday December 21, 2016 @09:08AM (#13229153)
That's not a cost, that's a benefit. There's not one ad-supported site I care about that I wouldn't be willing to donate to. And I'd be ecstatic if Facebook/Twitter/Instagram/BuzzFeed/etc. went out of business.
Re:AdNauseam: Fight Back Against Advertising Networks and Pr... by TeMPOraL on Wednesday December 21, 2016 @07:20AM (#13228523)
It can be argued that those sites going bust is actually a good thing. So the payoff matrix favors ad blocking both short and long-term.
Re:AdNauseam: Fight Back Against Advertising Networks and Pr... by redner on Thursday December 22, 2016 @11:58AM (#13238527)
if you dont have money for a site, you can't have one, that is the universal law of life, i would like to have a alienware, but i can't afford it, i don't go spamming people around....