Re:AdNauseam: Fight Back Against Advertising Networks and Pr...
by Sir_Cmpwn on Tuesday December 20, 2016 @04:36PM
(#13224279)
Depends on the content. I like Patreon-style for YouTube, and that also occasionally fits with other things. I would also subscribe to a good source of news, though I haven't found one that qualifies as such yet.
Re:AdNauseam: Fight Back Against Advertising Networks and Pr...
by enraged_camel on Tuesday December 20, 2016 @04:40PM
(#13224317)
Not the OP, but I prefer subscriptions. It's a direct exchange of money for value, and doesn't involve a creepy middleman whose incentive is to track you across the web.
Re:AdNauseam: Fight Back Against Advertising Networks and Pr...
by kuschku on Tuesday December 20, 2016 @04:41PM
(#13224324)
I pay for the news that I read online by having subscribed to them also in paper form, or by paying taxes.
Most other services I use are paid via subscription fees, or are run ad-free by people as hobby projects.
Almost all the ad-supported services I use are monopolies anyway, have strict network lock-in effects, and shouldn't be in private hand anyway, instead they should be run by a cooperative, foundation, or government. (For example, web search, maps, phone books, etc).
This leaves us with a few ad-supported pages which likely couldn’t directly survive in this new environment, but which rely on content creators for their business anyway – such as YouTube.
For such cases, something like Flattr, but paid out by view, would be useful – something like the Datenträgerabgabe for the GEMA and VG Wort, but paid per month, not per empty CD bought.
What is your preferred method of paying people on the internet for their content? Do you think that micropayments would be a valid way to deal with this compensation gap?