News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber sets self-driving battle at permission, not existence by jheriko on Tuesday December 20, 2016 @04:24PM (#13224160)
uber. i have nothing against improving these services, but doing it with such blatant disregard to the law.

if this was just some guy on the street, or even most businesses the authorities would come down on them like a ton of bricks... but its a silicon valley posterchild so we don't.

its so difficult to see and not feel anger about it. if i don't do my due diligence or act intelligently i feel uncomfortable like i'm taking a stupid risk... why don't they?

Re:Uber sets self-driving battle at permission, not existence by TeMPOraL on Tuesday December 20, 2016 @05:35PM (#13224888)
Maybe Uber is secretly in legislative pentesting business - working to probe just how much laws they can break and still get away with it.