News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Uber sets self-driving battle at permission, not existence.

Re:Uber sets self-driving battle at permission, not existence by peterbonney on Tuesday December 20, 2016 @03:25PM (#13223596)
This is ridiculous analysis. If Uber loses (or wins) this DMV "permission" battle they don't magically win the "existence" battle. The state never forfeits its right to challenge whatever it wants to challenge, whenever it wants to challenge it. And if the state loses in court it can even change the law and fight again - no private entity has that power.

To the extent Uber is doing something clever, it probably has something to do with avoiding having to spend $150 for every entity or person that wants to buy a self-driving car and rent it out through Uber. It is certainly not that they have found a brilliant way to sidestep a legal battle with regulators.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Uber sets self-driving battle at permission, not existence by kuschku on Tuesday December 20, 2016 @05:06PM (#13224592)
> And if the state loses in court it can even change the law and fight again - no private entity has that power.

Sadly, not at all – Uber will just sue in some court of some trade deal, and find a way to get around that. Just like so many companies have done before.

[ Parent | on HN ]