If you can wait until February, AMD Zen is coming out, so no matter which camp (amd/intel) you are in, all prices should go down for the given level of performance.
16 GB System Memory (DDR4, 2133 MHz)
NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 1060 (6GB GDDR5 VRAM)
Intel® Core i7-6700HQ Quad-Core Processor (2.6GHz / 3.5GHz)
256GB (PCIe M.2) options for 512/1024
14.0-in. IGZO QHD+, 3200x1800, capacitive multi-touch
http://www.razerzone.com/store/razer-blade#QHD+%20-%20256GB
What you linked to isn't 2016 Blade.
16:9 is kinda crappy, but 3200x1800 is resolution that works nicely at @2x. Seems better than both the MBP (too low for @2x) and 4K (too high for @2x, too low for @3x).
What's the battery and noise/heat level like on those?
If you have to ask this question, a gaming laptop is not for you.
To be fair, with the new Macs you still get to daisy chain adapters...
Here's the thing, nobody can take away how great the Macs we have now were when they came out. The fact that it was so well built and so powerful that you're still using it after 5 years speaks exactly to what we loved about them.
But the new MBPs aren't the same. They're just as expensive as they always were, but they don't have forward-looking specs. Unlike the old ones, we don't see the new ones being machines we can keep around for the next 5 years.
I've got a 2013 MBP and it's got virtually identical specs as the new 2016s. (Used similarly upgraded from base units both times -- with Apple care this cost ~$3,300 then and would cost ~$3,300 now.)
--- 2013 MBP
16 GB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M with 2GB memory
2.3 GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7
512 GB SSD
Apple Build Quality
vs
--- 2016 MBP ($2,800)
http://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/macbook-pro?product=MLH42L...
16 GB RAM
Radeon Pro 455 with 2GB memory
2.7 GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7
512 GB SSD
Apple Build Quality
vs
--- 2016 Razer Blade ($2,200)
http://www.razerzone.com/store/razer-blade-gtx970m
16 GB RAM
NVIDIA® GeForce GTX 970M with 6GB memory
2.6GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7
512 GB SSD
Razer Build Quality