Re:Google wants driverless cars, but do we?
by saint_fiasco on Monday December 19, 2016 @02:17PM
(#13214142)
Packing cars together and synchronizing them is probably the safer way. Less chance that a car, person or animal will get between two cars if the space between them is less.
How many pedestrians are killed by jumping between two train wagons?
Re:Google wants driverless cars, but do we?
by protomyth on Monday December 19, 2016 @03:08PM
(#13214586)
I would rather we take small step, and frankly deer have no problem jumping into groups of cars or even between semis and their trailers. They are not a situationally aware animal.
> How many pedestrians are killed by jumping between two train wagons?
How many tires blow out per year, or cars get slippery?
Re:Google wants driverless cars, but do we?
by saint_fiasco on Monday December 19, 2016 @06:08PM
(#13215812)
Fewer tires than they would if a computer checked their air pressure diligently.
Taking small steps is fine, but the smallness should be in the location, not the density. Just a small neighborhood with only self driving cars, instead of a large neighborhood with a small proportion of self driving cars.
And of course, a deer-free neighborhood will be best to start with.
If we expect to get to that level, then the crash investigators better be closer to airplane crash level care then our current level of investigation.