News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gimli Glider by computator on Sunday December 18, 2016 @06:25PM (#13208348)
> Mythbusters, I rarely come out of watching that show feeling like I really learned something

The earliest episodes were more scientific and educational. They spent quite a bit of time explaining how they were going to construct something and then showing how they actually built it. It became pure entertainment--devoted especially to blowing things up--once the show achieved success.

Another example of a show descending to the lowest common denominator: The first years of "Biography" on the A&E Network had stories about explorers, scientists, and world leaders--Michelangelo, Henry Ford, Julius Caesar, Marconi, Marco Polo--but now it's nothing but celebrities.

Re:Gimli Glider by 464192002d7fe1c on Sunday December 18, 2016 @06:33PM (#13208387)
Agreed, the earlier episodes were better, but I still don't think they were great. The last season of the show (when it was just Jayme/Adam) was actually fantastic though.

I've never actually seen any of the biography series (I just associate it with shallow celebrity profiles) I'll have to dig up the earlier episodes, thanks!

Re:Gimli Glider by protomyth on Sunday December 18, 2016 @10:54PM (#13209417)
I do wonder how the show by the assistants will do on Netflix. I too cannot say I'm a fan of the original. Their snowplow episode hit way too close to home and came to entirely the wrong (and a dangerous) conclusion. Testing anything having to do with snow, ice, and curved road surface on a flat, dry runway is doomed to failure with horrific reporting of results.

[I get it, no criticism of Myth Busters allowed]