Re:Ask HN: Does anyone else have problems with Instagram API...
by AlexWhite_ on Saturday December 17, 2016 @11:33AM
(#13201250)
This solution is insecure. Any person can intercept token and make harm to your application.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Does anyone else have problems with Instagram API...
by xmrcivicboix on Saturday December 17, 2016 @07:30PM
(#13203614)
I completely agree. Hence I said it's temporary. When you have a huge influx of paying customers who cannot log in to do their work, you have to balance that a bit.
Re:Ask HN: Does anyone else have problems with Instagram API...
by svens_ on Monday December 19, 2016 @08:27AM
(#13211211)
It doesn't seem too bad when enforcing https (using the return address whitelisting in the developer console). Am I missing something?
Re:Ask HN: Does anyone else have problems with Instagram API...
by AlexWhite_ on Monday December 19, 2016 @04:31PM
(#13215140)
Customer will see token anyway
Re:Ask HN: Does anyone else have problems with Instagram API...
by svens_ on Monday December 19, 2016 @06:51PM
(#13216098)
Ah yes, of course. I did miss that. The implicit (client-side) auth flow gets the access token directly and doesn't need another request to the API, that's the whole point.
This is indeed rather unwanted, even more so with the new more restrictive API usage policy and the sandbox.