News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why don't more physicists subscribe to pilot wave theory?. Parent comment

Re:Why don't more physicists subscribe to pilot wave theory? by qubex on Saturday December 17, 2016 @11:08AM (#13201152)
Very astute, I missed the implication that Pilot Wave theory has transient non-equilibrium states. Thanks for mentioning that.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why don't more physicists subscribe to pilot wave theory? by naasking on Saturday December 17, 2016 @12:01PM (#13201365)
An introduction for the interested [1]. It would be neat if someone could come up with an experimental test. The very existence of non-equilibrium would immediately falsify Copenhagen.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_non-equilibrium

[ Parent | on HN ]