They are 'on' subjects people care about enough to click.

Nobody cares about the specifics of Venezuelan currency exchange. So they don't cover it.

It's absurd to suggest they are 'not covering it' because the US government is intervening on that issue. Totally absurd.

Canada is the US #1 trading partner, and how much coverage do you see about Canada? None. We have a new Prime Minister and it barely makes the news. We have major trade disputes on going - zero coverage. Because nobody cares.

Trump, Taylor Swift, the current SJW meme, and the last 'shooting' and whatever is trending on Twitter is what they cover.

There is a war going on in Mosul, Americans involved, and since the start of that action there's been zero coverage.

It's because people don't care enough. That's it. There's no conspiracy.

You want details on Mosul go to AlJazeera. You want details on Canada go to the CBC. etc.

When I said "our media is intervened by the government" I meant -local- media in Venezuela, under direct influence of Venezuela's government. Local TV channels (Globovisión, Televen, VTV...), local newspapers, local radio stations, etc. I do get the point that US media doesn't cover our stories in detail because US audiences aren't that interested, I just don't understand why you keep pointing that out in this context.

Oh, I see. Venezuelan media is controlled - sure.

My bad, I guess - but it's really not clear from that post that you're referring to the Venezuelan press, as opposed to the US press. When you say 'our press' I didn't know you meant 'Venezuelan' , most people are not familiar with the acronym you used there on the first line. I assumed it was American, actually.