Resign and allow an economically sane government instead of a communist former bus driver to run things. I know he loves power but you'd think he could look at the food lines and horrific hospitals and admit someone else might be better qualified.

Fine, let's say he resigns. What actions should the leader who takes over do to turn the economy around?

Merely allowing normal currency free currency trading rather than the strange mess they have at the moment and dropping price controls would fix a lot of the problems. Also allowing largely free trade and freedom of doing business and charging a normal market price for gas would help.

They could also apologize to the likes of Maria Lourdes Afiuni and try to reinstate rule of law and return some of the confiscated businesses to their owners.

Venezuela used to be the richest country in South America and has possibly the worlds largest oil reserves. It's taken some impressively bad governance to get it to its present state.

Figure out what else you can export. Borrow and spend on public infrastructure projects.

> Borrow and spend on public infrastructure projects.

That's a little hard to do when you're currently facing hyperinflation.

Stop running the printing presses. Venezuela's hyperinflation is caused by one thing and only one thing, Venezuela is just printing money as fast as it can.

> Venezuela's hyperinflation is caused by one thing and only one thing, Venezuela is just printing money as fast as it can.

Okay, then how are you going to "borrow and spend on public infrastructure"? Where is that money going to come from? If you're not going to print it now, you can float a bond, but that bond is going to be backed buy the promise of future solvency. And investors have very little reason to have faith in the future solvency of that government, which means we're back to either printing money to fulfill the bond or defaulting.

> Okay, then how are you going to "borrow and spend on public infrastructure"? Where is that money going to come from?

Countries suffering from hyperinflation don't borrow and spend on public infrastructure. They run the printing presses to make money so they pay off the military, police and their high level supporters to stay in power.

> If you're not going to print it now, you can float a bond, but that bond is going to be backed buy the promise of future solvency.

No one is buying bonds from a country suffering from hyperinflation. That would be crazy.

Unfortunately for Maduro, the only way to solve this problem is to replace the government, introduce a new currency and stop running the printing presses.

Okay, it's not THAT simple, but it is a good start.

> No one is buying bonds from a country suffering from hyperinflation. That would be crazy.

Yes, that's what I'm saying. Which is why the "solution" isn't as simple as "borrow and spend on public infrastructure".

The only option after abdicating your dictatorship (if that's what he'd do after telling the truth), is to flee the country. If you stay, you'll be killed.

Fine, let's say he flees the country. What actions should the leader who takes over do to turn the economy around?

Jail all communists. Cut expenses by factor of 3x. Introduce a stable currency (e.g. «equivalent of 1 USD» - equo). Force creation of new small firms by providing government couching and assistance, while also reduce taxes for them to bare minimum — small business can soak lot of unemployment for free. Rely on large business to cover government expenses, but be realistic: no taxes means no expenses.

PS.

Moreover, remove all regulations and restrictions which are not vitally important. It's equivalent of turn off of all consumers of electricity when starting of a car engine.

Starting by jailing your political opponents... That doesn't seem like a good way to build trust.

I won't deny atrocities have been committed by communists, but let's not forget plenty of atrocities have been committed by capitalists too. Plenty of wars have also been fought by capitalist countries over material wealth. There has also been violence committed by proxy, the CIA alone has had its hand in numerous regime changes throughout the world, often favouring regimes that kept their people in line with violence.

I suppose the question then becomes what links the atrocities committed by communists and capitalists. Perhaps it's a power thing?

So, CIA saved millions of people by overthrowing communists regimes, right?

Let's look at what happened in Chile as one example, where you had Salvador Allende replaced by General Pinochet. Considering both of their records, do you think the CIA did the right thing in this case?

Introducing something like the Unit of Real Value could be a good start.

http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2010/10/04/130329523/how-f...