Re:World Energy Hits a Turning Point: Solar That's Cheaper T...
by SamPhillips on Friday December 16, 2016 @08:02PM
(#13198365)
Washington State rejected one, unfortunately, one significant downside of the state solution is that some demand can just easily shift to another location. I wonder if there's a scheme where on state will pass it but only have it come into affect if neighboring states do as well.
Re:World Energy Hits a Turning Point: Solar That's Cheaper T...
by DennisP on Friday December 16, 2016 @10:51PM
(#13199076)
A few states' actions wouldn't help much anyway. The real benefit of state carbon pricing was that the fossil industry was starting to come around on a national carbon price, because they'd rather deal with that than a bunch of different state systems.
Between the WA defeat and Trump win, that's probably pushed back a few years.
In fact, there's a fair amount of popular support for basic income. Meanwhile a leading idea for carbon pricing is a flat fee per ton with the money returned to the population, equal amount per capita, which essentially is a small basic income funded by the carbon tax.
British Columbia has a revenue-neutral carbon tax (in their case by reducing payroll taxes accordingly) and reportedly it's popular. The opposition party ran against it and lost.