Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by camgunz on Friday December 16, 2016 @02:24PM
(#13195970)
When you argue for the "absence of politics", you're actually arguing for the "default politics we've had for generations", which is heteronormative, euro-centric, etc. The "absence of politics" leads to widespread usage of anti-LGBT, anti-women, and anti-minority slurs and policies that disadvantage those groups by not recognizing their institutional disadvantage.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by flukus on Friday December 16, 2016 @03:14PM
(#13196366)
Without getting into details, I completely disagree. Being apolitical is not supporting "default politics". I support LGBT rights and equality for all, but this is the sort of BS that is making me and many others switch political allegiances.
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by jolux on Saturday December 17, 2016 @04:31PM
(#13202766)
But you're not apolitical. You're calling a transgender Ruby programmer a bully for asking if a maintainer on a project's harmful opinions about trans people reflected that project's opinions about trans people, and the reply was that their shitty opinions were comparable to somebody not liking candy. There's no bullying going on there.
>I support LGBT rights and equality for all, but this is the sort of BS that is making me and many others switch political allegiances.
I appreciate that you can say that, but honestly if stuff as minor as an uncomfortable conversation on GitHub is causing you to switch political allegiance (to whom/what exactly, might I ask?) you might reconsider whose side you were on in the first place.