News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why I Studied Full-Time for 8 Months for a Google Interview by beachstartup on Friday December 16, 2016 @01:08PM (#13195308)
it wasn't so long ago that nobody did this for tech, because we had a self-selecting industry that paid smart people very well, and those banker and consultant kids looked to us with a certain level of envy because we could naturally, seemingly effortlessly (not really), do what they studied years and years to do, which is make over 100 grand in your early 20's without really trying. those days are almost over. the b-school invasion is in its 2nd decade now.
Re:Why I Studied Full-Time for 8 Months for a Google Interview by ryandrake on Friday December 16, 2016 @01:30PM (#13195484)
> it wasn't so long ago that nobody did this for tech

Well, competition for jobs (especially the top ones) has never been so fierce. I remember my first job out of undergrad was programming for a (then) pretty well known hardware company. I cracked open a book on "how to write device drivers" the day before my interview and breezed through the interview and got the job. This would literally never happen today. Interviews (even at no-name "dog" companies) are so much tougher these days and there is so much competition that there is no longer room for mistakes.

These top employers are seen as kingmakers for engineers' careers. It's totally believable that one would spend months (or even years) preparing for a single company's interview.

Re:Why I Studied Full-Time for 8 Months for a Google Interview by cm2187 on Friday December 16, 2016 @03:43PM (#13196608)
I thought developers were now a scarce resource.
Re:Why I Studied Full-Time for 8 Months for a Google Interview by ryandrake on Friday December 16, 2016 @04:24PM (#13196991)
Yes, you're referring to the "shortage of tech workers" meme that just won't die, despite unprecedented levels of employer pickiness/selectivity and brutal, marathon, whiteboard-hazing-style interviews.
Re:Why I Studied Full-Time for 8 Months for a Google Interview by com2kid on Friday December 16, 2016 @03:32PM (#13196505)
> it wasn't so long ago that nobody did this for tech

How long ago is this?

When I was in school 10 years ago, I know I spent ~3 months studying for my upcoming interviews. I memorized all the big algorithms, and an entire book of programming puzzles.

Prior to that, in HS, I remember reading on /. about programming puzzle interviews.

Re:Why I Studied Full-Time for 8 Months for a Google Interview by beachstartup on Friday December 16, 2016 @03:58PM (#13196748)
waaaaay back in the 90s.

i remember having a stark realization one day that i probably couldn't get hired to do the same damn job again with any reliability, so thats when i took things into my own hands and started a company so i could deal with a different set of problems other than ace-ing stupid interviews.

that was right when i heard questions about interviewees being left in a room alone for 30 minutes, were being asked idiotic questions like "how many ping pong balls..." or being put in uncomfortable situations on purpose to test their reaction, dumb riddles, or any of a number of other non-work-related questions.

as someone who now has interviewed hundreds of people and hired dozens, i can unequivocally say that the above techniques are a stupid, idiotic, fucking dumb and counterproductive waste of time for hiring good people _for anyone who does not have the time and luxury (read: cash) to indulge in it_.

i would fire anyone who worked for me that insisted on doing interviews like that, because we are not google or mckinsey or goldman sachs and we do not have a never-ending supply of money.

Re:Why I Studied Full-Time for 8 Months for a Google Interview by user5994461 on Friday December 16, 2016 @04:00PM (#13196785)
Strange. I look at bankers, consultant, doctors and lawyers and they don't make any less than we do.
Re:Why I Studied Full-Time for 8 Months for a Google Interview by beachstartup on Friday December 16, 2016 @05:34PM (#13197515)
that's my point.