Re:Why numbering should start at zero (1982)
by rogual on Friday December 16, 2016 @07:02AM
(#13192673)
Not to mention it would eliminate the always-confusing "17th century == 1600s" thing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why numbering should start at zero (1982)
by cousin_it on Friday December 16, 2016 @07:41AM
(#13192837)
Yeah. I expanded this to its own post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13192826