Re:World Energy Hits a Turning Point: Solar That's Cheaper T...
by pjc50 on Friday December 16, 2016 @05:48AM
(#13192360)
Because they're very expensive and require liquid nitrogen cooling? Which itself represents energy consumption, so instead of losing energy as resistive losses you're spending it on cooling.
What's more likely is some form of energy-to-liquid-fuels process that runs during times and places of excess energy. The fuel can then be stored, pumped, trucked etc to other locations. This already exists, it's just not price-competitive with fossil fuels.
Re:World Energy Hits a Turning Point: Solar That's Cheaper T...
by XorNot on Friday December 16, 2016 @10:12AM
(#13193762)
Cooling benefits from insulation - the energy loss does not scale as an exponential factor, and levels off very dramatically (the deep sea is already very cold).
Re:World Energy Hits a Turning Point: Solar That's Cheaper T...
by rjvs on Friday December 16, 2016 @11:41AM
(#13194482)
We're trying to avoid the deep sea getting hot, remember?
Re:World Energy Hits a Turning Point: Solar That's Cheaper T...
by lighttower on Friday December 16, 2016 @11:15AM
(#13194222)
What about electrolysis of water into hydrogen and oxygen during the day?
https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/182278-the-worlds-first-...