The problem with this is you aren't really explaining why there needs to be a rule. Which is actually the biggest problem with getting net neutrality implemented. It's sort of a solution in search of a problem.

There hasn't been many largescale violations of it even when violations were legal.

Comcast blocking bittorrent is the only clearly bad example of a net neutrality violation I can think of. AT&T zero rating DirecTV streaming is the second but a lot of consumers see free and don't care.

True, which is why I intentionally framed the second line as "take more control" and "change how it works", implying a change from the current status quo. Maybe that's too subtle though.

I was watching an industry spokesperson explain (falsely) that net neutrality forces some companies to fall under one set of regulations, and others to fall under a different set. Getting rid of net neutrality meant that all companies would play by the same rules.

I'm not sure if I like this explanation because it seems to create an "us" versus "them" mentality without much nuance.

Is there any nuance? We're all equal on here or not.

I like "Google and Grandma" and will use that in the future, thanks :)