Re:Scientists engineer mice genomes to lengthen their lifesp...
by devoply on Thursday December 15, 2016 @07:34PM
(#13190069)
Yes, but poor people can't pay. That's why they can't solve anything. Google can spend a billion dollars on this. Multiple billions can be easily spent on this. And it's a great time for that. So much excessive capital. So many millionaires and billionaires. All going to die. What can scientists do to help them?
Re:Scientists engineer mice genomes to lengthen their lifesp...
by striking on Thursday December 15, 2016 @07:36PM
(#13190079)
We're looking for extended life for some people, without being able to guarantee a regular life for all.
What a world.
Re:Scientists engineer mice genomes to lengthen their lifesp...
by DennisP on Thursday December 15, 2016 @08:18PM
(#13190310)
Old people are expensive. If the people on Medicare were as healthy as the average 50-year-old, it would basically solve Medicare's long-term funding problem. If it cost, say, $100K every 10 years, it'd be worthwhile to give it to everyone for free.
Edit: checked numbers. There are about 40 million Americans 65 or older, and Medicare spends about $600 billion/year, for average annual spending of $15K each.
Re:Scientists engineer mice genomes to lengthen their lifesp...
by HaveCourage on Thursday December 15, 2016 @10:23PM
(#13190817)
50% of your lifetime medical cost occur in your last year of life. Old people aren't expensive, unhealthy and nearer death people are expensive. Delaying that last year of life by remaining robust is very profitable.
Re:Scientists engineer mice genomes to lengthen their lifesp...
by mynameisvlad on Thursday December 15, 2016 @07:50PM
(#13190167)
However, this technology would ostensibly over time get commoditized and available for everyone, like practically every other piece of technology so far.
Re:Scientists engineer mice genomes to lengthen their lifesp...
by wwweston on Thursday December 15, 2016 @08:30PM
(#13190359)
That's what we'd like to believe about ourselves. But until we're post-scarcity -- as long as other people are competition for limited resources (land, food, water, health care, even attention) -- I wouldn't be too quick to believe it.
Re:Scientists engineer mice genomes to lengthen their lifesp...
by eli_gottlieb on Thursday December 15, 2016 @07:47PM
(#13190149)
No, ultimately we're looking for unlimited life for everyone. We will not sell anyone to the dark.
Re:Scientists engineer mice genomes to lengthen their lifesp...
by Erik816 on Thursday December 15, 2016 @08:10PM
(#13190268)
I don't think "regular" is the adjective you are looking for. By definition there will always be lives that are not regular, both positively and negatively.
Re:Scientists engineer mice genomes to lengthen their lifesp...
by arithma on Thursday December 15, 2016 @07:42PM
(#13190108)
One is easier than the other I am afraid.
Re:Scientists engineer mice genomes to lengthen their lifesp...
by api on Thursday December 15, 2016 @08:41PM
(#13190396)
Rich people would get this first, but there'd be so much demand that unless there was something intrinsically expensive about a life extension tech (e.g. it required surgical intervention) you'd see geometric decreases in price. Then the patents would expire and it'd get mass produced in India for $0.05/pill.
Re:Scientists engineer mice genomes to lengthen their lifesp...
by kbenson on Thursday December 15, 2016 @08:50PM
(#13190433)
> Then the patents would expire and it'd get mass produced in India for $0.05/pill.
Forget patents. This is the sort of thing that will flood the black market, and could conceivably be a target for eminent domain. In any case, it will make it out to the public in some manner if it becomes a reality, I'm sure of that.
This is generally true of poor people as well.