Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by adrr on Thursday December 15, 2016 @05:39PM
(#13189299)
I figured MSFT was going to buy them and have it integrate nicely with Azure. They could do hosted enterprise github's natively on azure and would outclass code commit on AWS. Instead they bought linkedin which doesn't make sense to me.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by quanticle on Thursday December 15, 2016 @09:11PM
(#13190522)
Microsoft already has Visual Studio Team Services, which is its Git-compatible source code and work-item-tracking system. Like GitLab, VSTS is focusing on enterprise sales first (though there is a free-tier that you can play with). Why would Microsoft want to buy Github and try to refocus it when it already has a product that caters to its enterprise clientele?