Where did you get that from? I feel like we read different articles. Are you referring to the introduction where he suggests that people entirely new to programming should check out Pyret?

According to the article, learning Pyret is an efficient way to learn Python. It's a misleading title.

Huh? Where in the article did I say or imply that learning Pyret is an efficient way to learn Python? I said if you're a complete beginner then you can consider Pyret. As for people who already know some programming I didn't suggest Pyret to them at all.

Then he should have Pyret in the title here.

This article is 100% about a way to learn Python efficiently.

I'm being a little wary :)