News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber ordered to stop self-driving vehicle service in San ... by unclebucknasty on Wednesday December 14, 2016 @07:27PM (#13181137)
Seems like a reckless statement on a couple of fronts. For one, it's openly disrespectful to the human drivers upon whom they've relied to this point--seemingly regarding them as nuisances which must be discarded post-haste.

And, of course, it begs the question: what would their response have been if it was due to a technical glitch, which may yet happen? Their statement could easily be used against them.

Re:Uber ordered to stop self-driving vehicle service in San ... by jnky on Wednesday December 14, 2016 @07:43PM (#13181255)
> And, of course, it begs the question: what would their response have been if it was due to a technical glitch, which may yet happen?

That's not a problem at all. They'll just use "git blame" and fire the programmer whose "human error" caused the accident.