Re:New NIST password guidelines: don't require character typ...
by thomasahle on Wednesday December 14, 2016 @05:27AM
(#13175015)
How trivial is it? Would an attacker wanting to do one million attempts easily be able to send each from a different ip?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:New NIST password guidelines: don't require character typ...
by vidarh on Wednesday December 14, 2016 @07:14AM
(#13175409)
Most of the time when I see large scale password cracking attempts against customer servers, I have to block large blocks because they're coming from large number of IPs. I had to block most of South Korea at one point, because we saw abusive traffic from millions of IPs belonging to a couple of major ISPs in South Korea (thankfully non of our customers had much if any legitimate traffic from outside Europe at the time).
So the answer is: Some are already doing that.
Re:New NIST password guidelines: don't require character typ...
by eli on Wednesday December 14, 2016 @06:44AM
(#13175294)
Bad guys can easily rent time on botnets with hundreds of thousands of ips.
Re:New NIST password guidelines: don't require character typ...
by henvic on Wednesday December 14, 2016 @10:15AM
(#13176503)
So the solution for you seems to be allowing bad guys DoS your system because bad guys can do bad things, is it?
Re:New NIST password guidelines: don't require character typ...
by jessaustin on Wednesday December 14, 2016 @01:33PM
(#13178395)
Is per-IP rate limiting the only one way to respond to auth DoS? Different situations involve different trade-offs.