News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sovereign Software: peer to peer democracy by inimino on Wednesday December 14, 2016 @01:16AM (#13174223)
Irrational optimism is a positive effect?
Re:Sovereign Software: peer to peer democracy by dlss on Wednesday December 14, 2016 @01:31AM (#13174276)
From the perspective of those who aren't irrationally optimistic, I think sometimes.

Self-defeating example: betting on red in roulette is a bad idea. Having your friend bet on red is a better but still bad idea. Having a stranger bet on red, and buy you a drink if he wins... It's free money.

Applied example: starting an electric car company (at least looked like) a bad idea.... trying 1,000 different approaches to a light bulb, especially after 500 failures (at least looked like) a bad idea... etc.

Re:Sovereign Software: peer to peer democracy by inimino on Wednesday December 14, 2016 @03:31AM (#13174608)
People chasing long shots under a delusion can sometimes be profitable for someone else, but if a movement is built on irrational exuberance surely there's a cost to be paid sooner or later.
Re:Sovereign Software: peer to peer democracy by EthanHeilman on Wednesday December 14, 2016 @02:27PM (#13178904)
>if a movement is built on irrational exuberance surely there's a cost to be paid sooner or later.

I worry about a Blockchain winter, then again AI has made fantastic progress despite the AI winters[0].

Would fusion as a power generating technology be further along or further behind if it had followed the AI model (progress -> hype -> winter -> progress)?

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_winter