News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Waymo: Google's self-driving car company by londons_explore on Tuesday December 13, 2016 @04:50PM (#13171436)
>old fashioned hand coded features are necessary

I don't believe your hand coded features will outperform ML trained over a billion miles, even in the long tail rare events.

Sure ML is bad at rare events, but hand coded features also map poorly to such rare events, because it's unlikely you'll be able to imagine them all, or even manage to handle categories of rare events well.

Furthermore, I believe it would be possible to train an ML based rare-event detector, which simply detects the difference between "regular driving I'm familiar with" and "something funny is going on, I haven't seen this much in the training dataset", and then refer to a remote human to resolve the issue.

Re:Waymo: Google's self-driving car company by euyyn on Tuesday December 13, 2016 @06:55PM (#13172523)
> and then refer to a remote human to resolve the issue

Successful remote control is a whole different project, very different from self-driving. In order to give the remote pilot enough situational awareness, you need plenty of streamed imagery (recreated or recorded). And you need a feedback loop with a very small latency. Not saying it couldn't be done, but it won't happen "organically" by cars becoming self-driving.