Re:Quarter of inmates could have been spared prison without ...
by edblarney on Monday December 12, 2016 @06:57AM
(#13157410)
I think the problem in the US is the odd way you prosecute - you can do 'one thing' and up getting charted with '10 things' and getting 10 stacked sentences which adds up to 100 years.
Also - the punishment for small amounts of weed in most states is insane.
Likewise - the drinking age is crazy high in the US.
Some minor changes in the law could really quite radically affect how many people are in jail.
I'm not so sure about this.
It's the police/prosecutors that put people in there, and parole hearing folks as well - neither of which are 'private entities'.
So, the connection between 'headcount' and 'ownership' is not so direct.
It's entirely plausible that a small change in law could affect how many are actually put in prison.
Obviously - lobbying is an issue, but it's indirect.