News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on German judges explain their decision that ad-blocking software is legal. Parent comment

Re:German judges explain their decision that ad-blocking sof... by kuschku on Sunday December 11, 2016 @04:15PM (#13153294)
> especially given that the filter lists are made by volunteers.

Except, the acceptable ads list for larger companies can only be modified by Eyeo, and they only do it after being paid. It’s a racket.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:German judges explain their decision that ad-blocking sof... by bigbugbag on Sunday December 11, 2016 @06:18PM (#13154081)
Are you sure ? It was supposed to be handed over to an independent board in 2016[1].

[1]: https://gigaom.com/2015/09/30/adblock-plus-list-of-acceptabl...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:German judges explain their decision that ad-blocking sof... by kuschku on Monday December 12, 2016 @06:34AM (#13157330)
Have you checked their blog?

ABP still is "evaluating" that, and currently has a beta where acceptable ads are handled by an ad network as intermediate, which validates the quality of your ad, and handles payment to get it whitelisted.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:German judges explain their decision that ad-blocking sof... by greglindahl on Sunday December 11, 2016 @04:20PM (#13153331)
Oh, I totally agree that it's a racket. My point about the filter lists is that the block lists are made by volunteers. Not the acceptable ad list. Sorry that I wasn't clear.
[ Parent | on HN ]