News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Antitrust inquiry into Apple over Section 3.3.1 by ergo98 on Monday May 03, 2010 @12:15PM (#1315091)
"They're making choices based on what they think is best for their platform, and letting the market chose."

The former is absolutely true. The latter is absolutely not. Hence why the government is looking into it.

Apple's actions are completely inexcusable and borderline illegal. It is only by incredible bravado and arrogance that they could have ever thought that 3.3.1 would be acceptable. They could have accomplished the same goal more subtly, but, probably due to Jobs universe-sized ego, they had to bring this upon themselves.

"This is how the free market is supposed to work."

No, it isn't at all how the free market is supposed to work. 3.3.1 is the exact opposite of a free market.

Re:Antitrust inquiry into Apple over Section 3.3.1 by archgrove on Monday May 03, 2010 @12:31PM (#1315146)
How are Apple preventing you from buying the ever more popular Android phones? Or Web OS phones? You, a member of the market, buy the phone with the features you want. If you don't like Apple products, or the app store they provide, buy one of the many hundreds of alternative smartphones, many of which have large adoption.
Re:Antitrust inquiry into Apple over Section 3.3.1 by ergo98 on Monday May 03, 2010 @12:48PM (#1315204)
"How are Apple preventing you from buying the ever more popular Android phones?"

They aren't and I have. Right now, however, the biggest momentum that the iP(hone|ad) has is the app market, and the fact that a lot of large organizations have special support for its walled garden. 3.3.1 is Apple's way of trying to ensure that it is a specially cultivated walled garden, and that it's more likely that "there's an app for that" only applies to the Apple devices.

I think it's a futile move that is too late, but that is the clearly obvious motive behind 3.3.1. It is anti-competitive and without justification, and honestly it's a bit bizarre that so many fail to grasp that.

Re:Antitrust inquiry into Apple over Section 3.3.1 by GHFigs on Monday May 03, 2010 @02:47PM (#1315655)
it's a bit bizarre that so many fail to grasp that

Have you considered the possibility that it is not so clear and obvious as you think?

Re:Antitrust inquiry into Apple over Section 3.3.1 by ptomato on Monday May 03, 2010 @12:27PM (#1315129)
You're missing the bit where Apple isn't by any means the only phone manufacturer around.
Re:Antitrust inquiry into Apple over Section 3.3.1 by gte910h on Monday May 03, 2010 @02:48PM (#1315657)
Re:Antitrust inquiry into Apple over Section 3.3.1 by ergo98 on Monday May 03, 2010 @01:25PM (#1315347)
And you're missing the part where they're a $250 billion dollar company.

This has nothing to do with being a monopoly. When big companies do shitty things to undermine normal competitive forces they get scrutiny.