Re:AMD responds to Linux kernel maintainer's rejection of AM...
by mangeletti on Saturday December 10, 2016 @09:16AM
(#13145721)
Maybe this is why their net is negative; because they don't allocate money to the right things.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AMD responds to Linux kernel maintainer's rejection of AM...
by c0nfused on Saturday December 10, 2016 @04:30PM
(#13148033)
In my experience supporting Linux desktop is hardly ever the right thing.
Example: ubutnu cannot consistently ship a version of network manager that supports reconnecting to a wifi network suspend with out being manually restarted.
I suspect that at a dollar value there is most no point but I don't have access to enough data to prove it.
Re:AMD responds to Linux kernel maintainer's rejection of AM...
by angry_octet on Saturday December 10, 2016 @06:43PM
(#13148640)
Your example re wifi is not great, works fine for me. Dell hardware.
Re:AMD responds to Linux kernel maintainer's rejection of AM...
by anonbanker on Monday December 12, 2016 @10:12AM
(#13158551)
> Lennart Poettering's NetworkManager
Your experience is limited, and tainted. wpa-supplicant by itself can accomplish what you desire; NetworkManager (poorly) adds three or four extra layers of abstraction on top of that.
Meanwhile, Wicd and connman do exactly what you need, and don't constantly crash while doing it.
Blame ubuntu for following Red Hat's lead, and using their "solutions" to the problem.