News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Functional Programming Matters (1984) [pdf] by willtim on Saturday December 10, 2016 @04:34AM (#13144873)
Nice write up. I'm not sure "Lispified" assembly language really counts as functional programming though. It suggests a layering approach that I suggested originally. Of course, Lisps ubiquitous linked-list and dynamic types are issues for efficient compilation that are not shared by every functional language. The Mirage project is having a lot of success writing a lot of low-level code in OCaml.
Re:Why Functional Programming Matters (1984) [pdf] by kazinator on Sunday December 11, 2016 @10:53AM (#13151541)
Why would you slavishly try to stick to a functional approach when making device drivers in Lisp (or anything else).