You seem to have left out this entire paragraph in your summary of the law you sited
> a. Relate at the time of conception or reduction to practice to Company’s business, or actual or demonstrably anticipated research or development.
No, that's in the text I quoted and I referred to it in my original comment: the CA courts have historically sided with the employees over the companies except when it was pretty unambiguous that the employee was going into the same business as their (former) employer, e.g. Avant! -- which typically includes actual taking of source code.
On the other hand stories like google's self driving car team departing to start their own self driving car company, or the tons of people who have left Cisco to start routing companies are legion.
Do you live in California? If not, I have no idea what law applies to you and your work.
But if you live in California you are in luck: Section 2872 of the labor code is explicit in this matter. In fact every employee assignment agreement I have handed out to someone I've hired (going back to 1989) has included the text of that section, for example:
Don't use the company's computer, phone, network, IP etc. Don't try to make your day job a side project. Don't let your side project get in the way of your day job (or you'll get fired just 'coz you didn't do your day job). Otherwise: no problem.This law is widely cited as one of Silicon Valley's advantages over other places.
California went through a period of rational law making, e.g. laws like this, a presumption that drivers know what they are doing regardless of the posted speed limit, etc. Then they went insane (three strikes etc) and the rest is, sadly, history. Still not as crazy as the rest of the USA though.