Re:AMD responds to Linux kernel maintainer's rejection of AM...
by kstrauser on Friday December 09, 2016 @10:12PM
(#13143795)
Correction: we have the resources. We just don't want to allocate them and would prefer that you did the work instead.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AMD responds to Linux kernel maintainer's rejection of AM...
by AlisdairO on Friday December 09, 2016 @10:15PM
(#13143813)
I would think that any company that's lost as much money for as long as AMD has has a right to say that they don't have the necessary resources.
Re:AMD responds to Linux kernel maintainer's rejection of AM...
by rasz_pl on Saturday December 10, 2016 @10:15AM
(#13145969)
The mere fact they are losing all this money means they DO have the resources, they just routinely waste them on stupid shit (seamicro/raptr etc).
Re:AMD responds to Linux kernel maintainer's rejection of AM...
by geezerjay on Saturday December 10, 2016 @03:51AM
(#13144767)
> Correction: we have the resources. We just don't want to allocate them and would prefer that you did the work instead.
Perhaps it's just internal politics: the company did in fact allocated the resources, the people put in charge failed to do their job, and once their screwup goes public they opt to shift the blame elsewhere.