Re:Votebook – A proposal for a blockchain-based electronic v...
by noobermin on Friday December 09, 2016 @10:03PM
(#13143763)
Switzerland has a population of 8.4M, about the population of NYC. US has >300M and a land area two orders of magnitude larger than Switzerland.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Votebook – A proposal for a blockchain-based electronic v...
by pooper on Friday December 09, 2016 @10:24PM
(#13143845)
> Switzerland has a population of 8.4M, about the population of NYC. US has >300M and a land area two orders of magnitude larger than Switzerland.
Can we start with the city? Bill de Blasio (bless his heart) won 282,344 votes in the 2013 Democratic Primary. What's worse is Lhota won his primary with just 32,236 votes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_mayoral_election...
I hate to agree with President Obama on this topic but I have to agree with him. The first problem we need to tackle is not to fix the electoral process. The first problem we need to tackle is getting people to actually care enough to show up and show up in large enough numbers so we can effect change.
Re:Votebook – A proposal for a blockchain-based electronic v...
by jackvalentine on Saturday December 10, 2016 @03:34AM
(#13144730)
Preferential voting and (and I realise this is pretty much impossible to get implemented if not already so these days....) compulsory voting.
Re:Votebook – A proposal for a blockchain-based electronic v...
by kalleboo on Saturday December 10, 2016 @07:01AM
(#13145263)
Maybe they should try splitting the US into smaller, self-governed districts. Maybe call them "states"?
Re:Votebook – A proposal for a blockchain-based electronic v...
by nickik on Friday December 09, 2016 @10:15PM
(#13143812)
The US also has more people that work on that sort of thing. I don't see why it should not be able to scale.
Sure it might get harder with increase scale, but I don't see it as a huge problem.