Re:AMD responds to Linux kernel maintainer's rejection of AM...
by Analemma_ on Friday December 09, 2016 @06:29PM
(#13142810)
If it was a big secret that this was how Linux worked and it took the companies by surprise, I could see how this could be a bad thing, but it never has been: Linus has always been very upfront that he is Benevolent Dictator for Life and always has the last word. Don't get onboard if you don't like that system.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AMD responds to Linux kernel maintainer's rejection of AM...
by wolfgke on Friday December 09, 2016 @06:31PM
(#13142823)
Then all the Linux fans that complained to AMD that they don't deliver open source drivers should from now on better shitstorm the kernel maintainers, since AMD delivered.
Re:AMD responds to Linux kernel maintainer's rejection of AM...
by jlgaddis on Friday December 09, 2016 @06:48PM
(#13142922)
There is absolutely nothing preventing AMD from delivering their own open-source drivers to their customers.
They want it in kernel, however, and that means they have to play by the in kernel rules.
Re:AMD responds to Linux kernel maintainer's rejection of AM...
by prodigal_erik on Friday December 09, 2016 @10:28PM
(#13143858)
AMD didn't deliver a Linux driver. They delivered a Windows driver plus a bunch of glue code that nobody really wants. In the best of all possible worlds, somebody would dissect the Windows driver for instruction and write a proper Linux driver and nobody would try to run the Windows driver as-is.
Re:AMD responds to Linux kernel maintainer's rejection of AM...
by trome on Saturday December 10, 2016 @04:30AM
(#13144866)
This wasn't an open source driver, this was a hardware abstraction layer that they wanted in the kernel so their Windows driver could be distributed under a proprietary license and used without a kernel recompile.
A year ago AMD said they would just use what is currently in the kernel with a few minor modifications to get their driver working in userspace, apparently they did not follow through on that though