News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Meaningness by ashark on Friday December 09, 2016 @03:39PM (#13141643)
I've read/skimmed a ways in. I'd say your judgement of it was sound. There's been a lot of, "wait, you know this is a whole thing, right? [reads a little farther] Huh, guess not." More than you might expect from the introduction, in fact—it keeps stumbling against the edges of those sorts of well-explored topics across a surprisingly broad range.
Re:Meaningness by MaxfordAndSons on Friday December 09, 2016 @04:23PM (#13141973)
I'm pretty sure the author is in fact well versed in various philosophical traditions, but intentionally chooses not to directly engage them (in the course of the main text) because the project is not intended to be a discursive philosophical text but rather a sort of self-help book, for lack of a better term.
Re:Meaningness by AnimalMuppet on Friday December 09, 2016 @06:20PM (#13142749)
He's not trying to talk to the philosophers. He's trying to talk to STEM people. So he chooses his writing style and terminology to that end.