News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On Getting Older in Tech by qznc on Friday December 09, 2016 @07:33AM (#13138367)
> use your wisdom to understand which technology/language is going to survive the test of time

I usually use statistics. If you select a random point on the lifetime of something. There is a 50% chance, that you are closer to the middle then either start or end. Thus: Always assume you are roughly in the middle of the lifetime. In other words, if some technology is only one year old, assume it is dead in another year.

Re:On Getting Older in Tech by mysterypie on Friday December 09, 2016 @09:09AM (#13138795)
That's a great rule of thumb. You should give it a catchy name so people remember it.

When I don't have good insight into whether it's worth my time to learn some new tech, I'm going to try to apply this rule.

Re:On Getting Older in Tech by inimino on Friday December 09, 2016 @12:44PM (#13140244)
This is the Lindy Effect[1].

[1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_effect

Re:On Getting Older in Tech by bonoboTP on Friday December 09, 2016 @11:05AM (#13139489)
Re:On Getting Older in Tech by planteen on Friday December 09, 2016 @11:04AM (#13139475)
So that means C looks pretty safe... 44 years. C++ is 33 years.
Re:On Getting Older in Tech by delegate on Friday December 09, 2016 @09:41AM (#13138966)
Nice piece of wisdom right there, thank you!