Re:Say No to Paxos Overhead: Replacing Consensus with Networ...
by meta_AU on Friday December 09, 2016 @04:09AM
(#13137604)
Use a single node to provide all-or-nothing and ordering, then simplify Paxos based on those assumptions.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Say No to Paxos Overhead: Replacing Consensus with Networ...
by hardwaresofton on Friday December 09, 2016 @04:39AM
(#13137725)
Thanks -- After reading the paper I think I have a better understanding, and it is pretty exciting, this does seem to be a pretty good throughput improvement, especially if things are mostly happy-path.
The paper seemed to be missing an exploration of worst-case scenarios and equivalencies though, but I guess I guess worst case is paxos speed (consistently failing sequencer, or a leading replica that receives one messages then is unreachable, bad quorums, etc)