News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Kent Beck: “I get paid for code that works, not for tests” (2013). Parent comment

Re:Kent Beck: “I get paid for code that works, not for tests... by Nelkins on Thursday December 08, 2016 @10:46AM (#13130974)
I like having the linearity of definitions and files. It makes reading unfamiliar code bases much easier, as it means the code has a "beginning" and "end." To me it fits well with the F# theme of sensible defaults.

If you do need to get around it though, you can have mutually referential types in F# if you use the "and" keyword (although the definitions of the types have to be right next to one another). And in the next update to F# you'll be able to have mutually referential types and modules within the same file which is often good enough for most other things you might need that sort of thing for.[1]

[1] https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/dotnet/2016/07/25/a-peek-in...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kent Beck: “I get paid for code that works, not for tests... by johncolanduoni on Thursday December 08, 2016 @12:44PM (#13132244)
I think the linearity can force you to streamline things, but personally I often have to resist the urge to bike-shed the order in which I write functions in the same file, let alone what order I want to put my files in. I end up being torn between different orders I would want in different situations, and would love a language or IDE that would let me view definitions in different orders depending on what I'm looking for.
[ Parent | on HN ]